[N]Conq wrote:The promulgation and publication of 1v1 results is vulgar and in bad taste. Games involving three or more players are fine, but 1v1s are just too personal to warrant the kind of attention that Azor seems to have sought, and indeed been awarded.
1v1s are for gentlemen, not the peasants. Azor, consider yourself lowered in my estimation, irrespective of your frankly surprising victory.
Regards,
Conq
god, i am so glad, how Ns really love me starting from its aspirant to the generals
I wont comment to the "surprising victory" part of your post above as i found it surprising too as i know how Fullin plays that game, but i like some lucky victories as well as deserved defeats.
but Conq, about posting 1v1 battles and being a gentleman or a peasant , maybe you should look at the "Application for commission to [V] ASPIRANT" form before you tell me these.
It says "List any three Battle Reports you have posted in the [N] Forum:"
Application for commission to [V] ASPIRANT
Name:
Age:
Email Address:
(Email address may be posted with application or sent by PM (Private Message) to Marshal Sloop)
List three [N] officers who have agreed to recommend you for membership:
1)
2)
3)
List any three Battle Reports you have posted in the [N] Forum:
1)
2)
3)
Rate your participation in the following areas (poor-average-good-excellent):
(Additional comments about your ratings are welcome)
1) Forum:
2) TeamSpeak:
3) Multiplayer battles:
Why should you join Napoleonics?
